Friday 26 April 2013

Liubov Zagorulko - Master's Student MGIMO University, Moscow


         Kaliningrad's issue was a very popular some years ago when 10 new countries, including Poland and Lithuania joined the EU. Now it seems to be less vital for Russian politicians and the most part of Russian population. But it is still important for residents of the region. And it could have a profound impact on Russian- EU relations. The question is what kind of impact? It could become only one of the controversial issue or an example of opportunities for the future. The former scenario is simple: using foreign policy issues as an instrument in domestic politics is natural for almost every political system. It can’t be done, however without any losses, above all loss of opportunities.

            That’s why the most probable scenario seems to be a kind of freezing the situation. Other words,  it is the most convenient to preserve a current situation, avoiding discussions and disagreement. Russian society and political community show little interest in the problem. Current domestic difficulties it hard for the European Union to pay sufficient attention to the issue.

           At the same time, there is a number of opportunities for Kaliningrad and for Russia itself to establish more effective and more successful relations with the EU. First of all, it could offer a new modality of relations based on variety of interrelations rather than on political statements and declarations.

       Secondly, it is interregional cooperation that is very important for the EU. Kaliningrad could be integrated into such regional system of relations.  It would be an effective way to understand the logic of regional cooperation in the EU and the logic of the EU development itself. In turn, it would help to understand nature of Russian social life.   Such an activity would be practical and fruitful because of smaller level of political bias. 

          Thirdly, Kaliningrad could become so called experimental platform for pilot projects between Russia and the EU, including special visa regime or free trade zone. Although such projects can be considered as rather unlikely and difficult for implementation at the moment, it is not impossible at all but depends on political will and activity of  a society. Even preparation for such project could demonstrate economic, legal and other differences between Russia and the EU.  The diagnosed cleavage should be negotiated and every possible solutions could be found by discussions. Recent agreement between the EU and  South Korea demonstrates flexibility and realistic approach to establishing of relations with important partners. It is high time to reach mutually advantageous cooperation between Russia and the EU, at least on the interregional level.

         It should be emphasized that political will could only provide the framework for cooperation. The genuine partnership should be established between business and social communities. It means that there is a need of mutually acceptable, clear and simple rules of business activity.  Despite the fact the EU is facing economic difficulties the cooperation would be profitable for both sides. In turn, such relations should be based on well grounded calculations in order to prevent Russian side from being disappointed.

         In theory governments express support the third scenario of closer cooperation between Kaliningrad and the EU. In fact, there is an obvious  lack of practical steps to make Kaliningrad's issue a source of opportunities rather than a cause of misunderstanding. 

3 comments:

  1. Thank you for the essay! Your point of view is clearly presented. But let me ask for supporting details: do you really think "it is the most convenient to preserve a current situation"? As far as I could understand, the most probable scenario is "freezing the situation". What facts made you think so?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for the question! I release that my position seems to be a little bit pessimistic, but I'm not pretend to make a absolutely objective and comprehensive essay because of the very nature of this kind of paper.
    Let me now point some details to support my position. There a sufficient number of initiatives and programs, showing that Russian government is concerned with the region. First of all, the region is not only dependent on the federal center both politically and economically. It also suffers from the same problems such as corruption, poor management, weak judicial system etc. So, I still have little evidence to be optimistic about the effective implementation of all these programs. Although, that remains to be seen.
    Secondly, the next steps could require bold initiatives up to giving special status for the region, that is difficult to implement in the in current domestic framework. I'm not sure about strong support by Russian society as well.
    Thirdly, although an agreement on local border traffic between Russia and Poland should be treated as a very positive example both for the region as well as for our relation with the EU, Russian experts are not eager to believe in further development. (Долой визы? http://www.alleuropa.ru/doloy-vizi) Lack of political will seem to be a maim obstacle as earlier.
    According to the EU, a decision on the launch of negotiations on a visa waiver agreement can be taken only after the implementation of the "Common Steps towards visa-free short-term travel". These common steps include such controversial issue as combating illegal immigration and border management; the fight against transnational organized crime, terrorism and corruption as well as human rights (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-1011_en.htm).
    So, I don't insist that it's most probable not to act at all, but there are too little evidence for decisive and significant positive changes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I see what you mean now, thanks!

    ReplyDelete