Kaliningrad's issue was a very popular some
years ago when 10 new countries, including Poland and Lithuania joined the EU.
Now it seems to be less vital for Russian politicians and the most part of
Russian population. But it is still important for residents of the region. And
it could have a profound impact on Russian- EU relations. The question is what
kind of impact? It could become only one of the controversial issue or an
example of opportunities for the future. The former scenario is simple: using
foreign policy issues as an instrument in domestic politics is natural for
almost every political system. It can’t be done, however without any losses, above
all loss of opportunities.
That’s why the most probable scenario seems to
be a kind of freezing the situation. Other words, it is the most convenient to preserve a
current situation, avoiding discussions and disagreement. Russian society and political
community show little interest in the problem. Current domestic difficulties it
hard for the European Union to pay sufficient attention to the issue.
At the same time, there is a number of
opportunities for Kaliningrad and for Russia itself to establish more effective
and more successful relations with the EU. First of all, it could offer a new
modality of relations based on variety of interrelations rather than on
political statements and declarations.
Secondly, it is interregional cooperation that
is very important for the EU. Kaliningrad could be integrated into such
regional system of relations. It would
be an effective way to understand the logic of regional cooperation in the EU
and the logic of the EU development itself. In turn, it would help to
understand nature of Russian social life.
Such an activity would be practical and fruitful because of smaller
level of political bias.
Thirdly, Kaliningrad could become so called
experimental platform for pilot projects between Russia and the EU, including
special visa regime or free trade zone. Although such projects can be
considered as rather unlikely and difficult for implementation at the moment,
it is not impossible at all but depends on political will and activity of a society. Even preparation for such project
could demonstrate economic, legal and other differences between Russia and the
EU. The diagnosed cleavage should be
negotiated and every possible solutions could be found by discussions. Recent
agreement between the EU and South Korea
demonstrates flexibility and realistic approach to establishing of relations
with important partners. It is high time to reach mutually advantageous
cooperation between Russia and the EU, at least on the interregional level.
It
should be emphasized that political will could only provide the framework for
cooperation. The genuine partnership should be established between business and
social communities. It means that there is a need of mutually acceptable, clear
and simple rules of business activity. Despite the fact the EU is facing economic
difficulties the cooperation would be profitable for both sides. In turn, such
relations should be based on well grounded calculations in order to prevent
Russian side from being disappointed.
In theory governments express support the third
scenario of closer cooperation between Kaliningrad and the EU. In fact, there
is an obvious lack of practical steps to
make Kaliningrad's issue a source of opportunities rather than a cause of
misunderstanding.
Thank you for the essay! Your point of view is clearly presented. But let me ask for supporting details: do you really think "it is the most convenient to preserve a current situation"? As far as I could understand, the most probable scenario is "freezing the situation". What facts made you think so?
ReplyDeleteThank you for the question! I release that my position seems to be a little bit pessimistic, but I'm not pretend to make a absolutely objective and comprehensive essay because of the very nature of this kind of paper.
ReplyDeleteLet me now point some details to support my position. There a sufficient number of initiatives and programs, showing that Russian government is concerned with the region. First of all, the region is not only dependent on the federal center both politically and economically. It also suffers from the same problems such as corruption, poor management, weak judicial system etc. So, I still have little evidence to be optimistic about the effective implementation of all these programs. Although, that remains to be seen.
Secondly, the next steps could require bold initiatives up to giving special status for the region, that is difficult to implement in the in current domestic framework. I'm not sure about strong support by Russian society as well.
Thirdly, although an agreement on local border traffic between Russia and Poland should be treated as a very positive example both for the region as well as for our relation with the EU, Russian experts are not eager to believe in further development. (Долой визы? http://www.alleuropa.ru/doloy-vizi) Lack of political will seem to be a maim obstacle as earlier.
According to the EU, a decision on the launch of negotiations on a visa waiver agreement can be taken only after the implementation of the "Common Steps towards visa-free short-term travel". These common steps include such controversial issue as combating illegal immigration and border management; the fight against transnational organized crime, terrorism and corruption as well as human rights (http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-1011_en.htm).
So, I don't insist that it's most probable not to act at all, but there are too little evidence for decisive and significant positive changes.
I see what you mean now, thanks!
ReplyDelete